Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prakash Sharma Poudel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. AFD withdrawn by submitter. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 18:27, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Prakash Sharma Poudel[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

All references links are dead. And the person is not notable. SeytX (talk) 08:48, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Discuss 08:50, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Discuss 08:50, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep:News media link-rot is not in itself a reason for deletion. The subject does not feature heavily in accessible media but enough can be found to confirm election, passing mention as speaking in parliament [1], and recently quoted briefly as "Baglung’s former lawmaker" [2]. Enough I think for WP:POLITICIAN #1. AllyD (talk) 11:21, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Dead links does not mean, it did not exist when it was retrieved. Notable as he is a member of 2nd Nepalese Constituent Assembly. -- Ascii002 (talk · contribs · guestbook) 14:15, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Yes, this requires referencing improvement, but if a person is properly verified as having served in a national legislature then we keep them to allow for improvement — the only way a politician at this level can be deleted is if they turn out to be an outright hoax. Bearcat (talk) 18:34, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep passes WP:POLITICIAN.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 19:22, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Clearly passes WP:POLITICIAN. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:30, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.