Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PoondiApp

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:52, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

PoondiApp[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reason Reason is not enough time to write article properly.

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 October 6. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Offline} 18:33, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The article was tagged for speedy deletion under WP:CSD#A7, but as a mobile application (i.e. a software product), it does not qualify under A7. The author of the article himself has brought it here to AFD, with the explanation that he does not have time to properly complete the article. That, in itself, qualifies for deletion under WP:CSD#G7, but I feel that the author was merely frustrated by the speedy deletion process. However, as the article author is also the author of the software, and the claims of significance are likely inflated (the app has not yet left beta stage, and has been removed from the Google Play Store due to its instabilities), I feel it is too soon to create a valid article about this application. Also, product's creator himself appears confused about whether or not it is a dating app (the first paragraph of the article says it is a social and dating app while later text says that it is not a dating app!), so until the app is cleaned up and the author figures out what he wants the app to be, we probably shouldn't have a Wikipedia article about it. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 18:59, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:53, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:53, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as literally a COI advertisement and nothing to suggest anything otherwise, the mere facts are only ones the company itself would care to mention and, as consensus has shown, are not what we accept here, it's quite contrary and that's because we're not a PR webhost. SwisterTwister talk 06:33, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Software article of unclear notability, lacking independent references. A search turned up no significant WP:RS coverage. Article was created by an SPA as possibly promotional. Dialectric (talk) 09:15, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Author first created this article then nominated it for deletion. So be it! Pavlor (talk) 09:47, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.