Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Polo Piatti (composer)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 01:30, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Polo Piatti (composer)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Polo Piatti is a salted title after repeated deletions. This page should be subjected to AfD, and if it survives, moved to the protected Polo Piatti. Legacypac (talk) 09:01, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 10:35, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 10:35, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Argentina-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 10:35, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete per WP:G4 (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Polo Piatti). If you really want a rationale, Piatti gets no coverage outside of non-notable local news like Hastings Online Times. This does not qualify as WP:SIGCOV and the sources' reliability is questionable. — Quasar G. 10:59, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per all the above. As I do not have the deleted article on hand, I can only speculate, but I choose to speculate that the concerns raised last time remain pointedly unaddressed in this new article. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 11:42, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There is also Draft:Polo Piatti which has been repeatedly declined and needs to go with this page. I'm redirecting it to the mainspace title. Legacypac (talk) 02:13, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep completely different content from the last deleted version.

http://speedydeletion.wikia.com/wiki/Polo_Piatti

Many sources are from Hastings & St. Leonards Observer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by NiuktKlaw (talk • contribs) 06:57, 24 June 2017 (UTC) — NiuktKlaw (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Comment Naming the article "Polo Piatti (composer)" means one of two things. First, it implies that there is another Polo Piatti who has an article on Wikipedia; the parentheses would distinguish between the two Polo Piattis, but since we don't even have coverage of one Polo Piatti, the parentheses are unnecessary. Second, it shows Mwoodham1990 (talk · contribs) named the page the way they did specifically to get around the restriction of creating the article at Polo Piatti, not interpreting the salting as the final ruling but only one more obstacle to overcome. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 11:16, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No coverage in reliable sources outside of local news. Just because a recreated article looks different from the deleted version doesn't mean that it should be kept. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 17:33, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.