Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Podiuming

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎ to Podium. Liz Read! Talk! 00:00, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Podiuming[edit]

Podiuming (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article does not go beyond a dictionary definition and Wikipedia is not a dictionary WP:NOTDICT. The article is poorly written and sourced. The concept of podiuming does not strike me as meeting criteria of notability. Ruud Buitelaar (talk) 22:54, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 21:51, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Redirect to Podium. There's a sentence in the lead of that article already about the use of the word as a verb; that's about as much coverage as this deserves on Wikipedia, and there's really nothing to merge per se. Brusquedandelion (talk) 04:12, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge with Podium: or redirect. Can't see any expansion potential for this beyond a DICTDEF that isn't already covered there. StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 18:25, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.