Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pirnat

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Geschichte (talk) 18:47, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pirnat[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Neither the name or the people who have it appear to be notable. ... discospinster _talk 21:50, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Slovenia-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:55, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. There are 15 people at sl:Pirnat with blue links, including the four listed here who are also on Commons. They are notable people waiting for articles to be written in English. Wikipedia:Name pages notes red links are fine for set index pages. Fences&Windows 22:02, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: Notability in other language Wikipedias does not automatically translate to notability in the English Wikipedia. If all of the entries are red links, someone should write the article(s) first before having an article listing them. ... discospinster _talk 22:18, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- WP:APORL from WikiProject Anthroponymy does not encourage red links. The page you linked is an individual's own separate essay.—Bagumba (talk) 11:37, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  - Yes, and that page links to WP:WTAF. ... discospinster _talk 19:55, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    @Fences and windows: There are hobbyist on slwiki, who add names and many are hard to proof to be notable. But all 4 listed are important for Slovenia and its culture, politics etc. A09090091 (talk) 15:10, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:45, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 23:12, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: It's been more than a week and the articles are all still red links. ... discospinster _talk 17:47, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:37, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 17:13, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep. Rajko is definitely notable and a couple of the others are probably so. There is no time limit for creating their articles. Clarityfiend (talk) 21:50, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: Are you going to create these articles or should we just wait for ... someone? ... discospinster _talk 00:58, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  - One down. Clarityfiend (talk) 09:57, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  - And now there are two. Clarityfiend (talk) 21:54, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, two articles now. —Kusma (talk) 10:37, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.