Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pickyourtrail (2nd nomination)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cabayi (talk) 07:00, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Pickyourtrail (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I'm not seeing significant coverage in independent and reliable sources. This article in The Hindu Business Line is a blatant promotion of the website, which makes me believe that the other The Hindu article might be sponsored too. The article was created by a user who is banned for spam/advertising (Also see the deletion log of PickYourTrail and Pickyourtrail.com). M4DU7 (talk) 07:37, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. M4DU7 (talk) 07:37, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. M4DU7 (talk) 07:37, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. M4DU7 (talk) 07:37, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:ORG. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 09:41, 19 April 2021 (UTC) 09:17, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting so there can be a firmer deletion consensus given concerns about article's creator.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 (talk) 02:31, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
Relisting comment: Relisting so there can be a firmer deletion consensus given concerns about article's creator.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 (talk) 02:31, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete If the other forms of this article, just with different capitalization or in URL form, were deleted for valid policy reasons I'd guess this one should go too. Gatemansgc (TɅ̊LK) 06:01, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. Coverage is very poor: niche websites, press release and their rewrites. Fails WP:NCORP. See also WP:CORPSPAM. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:51, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete this one per norm as my finding is consistent with the reasons above. Kaspadoo (talk) 19:46, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.