Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pekka Ruuska (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 03:15, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pekka Ruuska

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BLP of a Finnish curator. The fi.wiki article linked to it is about a completely different person who has the same name. A search for sources produced nothing to suggest that this particular Pekka Ruuska is in any way notable. Mccapra (talk) 22:45, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 22:45, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finland-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 22:45, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The fiwiki article is about the same person: fi:Pekka Ruuska (näyttelykuraattori). There was some mix-up with the interwikis a long time ago which can be seen in the history, but it is correct now. The Finnish article was created in 2007, deleted in 2009, and then recreated in 2012. (The 2012 version contained a "joke" that Ruuska was born in Russia. It was only fixed years later when a magazine wrote about it, and the English version had it up even longer.) -kyykaarme (talk) 10:33, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete He is mentioned or interviewed in some articles about art galleries, but I don't think there is enough coverage of him as a person. -kyykaarme (talk) 19:14, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kieran207(talk-Contribs) 02:12, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 (talk) 01:04, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:GNG, not enough reliable WP:RS. Namkongville (talk) 06:32, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.