Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peinnegon (15°58′N 98°21′E)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 23:37, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Peinnegon (15°58′N 98°21′E)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Attempted to verify location for disambiguating: there is no Peinnegon in this coordinate location or near Kyeikdon. Google Maps does label the village but this village at this location is not recognized by the General Administration Department according to this MIMU map or the place codes database. Related to this may be: Peinnegon (16°22′N 98°19′E), which is in both sources and nearby Peinhneseik (formerly at "Peinnegon (16°15′N 98°21′E)"). Based on these I don't believe this particular Peinnegon village exists nor would it meet WP:GEOLAND. EmeraldRange (talk/contribs) 16:23, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Myanmar-related deletion discussions. EmeraldRange (talk/contribs) 16:24, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. EmeraldRange (talk/contribs) 16:24, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Per nom. Can't even find the google maps label for some reason. Please ping me if other sources are found. ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 14:08, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I'd like to give this the opportunity for more people to weigh in,
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 17:27, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:15, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no objection to any statements made by nominator Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:28, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.