Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrik Vydra

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. RL0919 (talk) 19:47, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Patrik Vydra[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reviewed during NPP. No indication of wp:notability under GNG or SNG. Content is just "he plays football" and who for. One source is just a database entry and the other does not appear to even mention him North8000 (talk) 19:04, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Czech Republic. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 19:06, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The fact that the page is a stub is not a reason for deletion. He plays for the U21 and for the top Czech team in the Czech First League and in UEFA Europa League, that is, he belongs to the great talents of his generation. FromCzech (talk) 19:34, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just clarifying, I only mentioned the limited contents of the page as a reflection that it does not have the required sources to fulfill wp:notability....in depth coverage of the subject of the article. Sincerely, North8000 (talk) 19:41, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 16:32, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - no BEFORE has been undertaken. There are plenty of sources out there in Czech-langiage sources, such as this and this and this (the first two look good, but I don't read Czech). Article needs improvement, not deletion. Giant Snowman 16:38, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep since I agree with the notion of existing sources, but for the future, articles should ideally be created with the use of 2-4 such sources, fleshing out the article a little more than what was done here. The fairly recent shift in attitude towards sourcing of sportsperson articles is the way to go. Geschichte (talk) 17:12, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per all before Svartner (talk) 10:53, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep decent amount of coverage (abit in the Czech language) that help subject pass WP:GNG. Inter&anthro (talk) 15:24, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Blesk is a tabloid labeled GUNREL with the bad refs script, so that's out. The sport.cz article is almost entirely an interview, with the only secondary content being He always waited for dad to come home from work and go digging with him. And when Patrik Vydra was twelve, he moved from Beroun to Sparta. He won a title with her in the spring and is now a patient substitute, the defensive all-rounder picking up starts in the tight end A's minutes at a time. This is not SIGCOV.

JoelleJay (talk) 18:48, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

But that does not apply to the sources cited in the article. FromCzech (talk) 07:16, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The only source I saw with anything beyond a passing mention is the Berounsky piece, but now I see the full content of the Hradecky article isn't actually available to me. Does it go beyond just match coverage? JoelleJay (talk) 03:39, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Per above. Young player with ongoing career in Sparta Prague, one of best teams in fully pro Czech league. Article needs improvement, not deletion. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 21:09, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.