Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrick Dumont

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. plicit 13:20, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Patrick Dumont[edit]

Patrick Dumont (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability of the person is not clear. Looks like promotion Rodgers V (talk) 12:12, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep The majority shareholder of an NBA team seems like a notable figure. The article doesn't seem blatantly promotional, and it cites several valid sources. Zagalejo (talk) 23:58, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as the majority shareholder of a franchise in the NBA, one of the top sports leagues in the world, this person is notable and it can be presumed GNG-appropriate sources can be found about him. Even if no such sources are found, this would be a clear case to apply WP:IAR. Frank Anchor 02:52, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Fulfills WP:GNG. Vague reasoning for deletion by nom. \\ Loksmythe // (talk) 15:48, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep This article meets the criteria for notability and should be kept. Go4thProsper (talk) 01:18, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Clearly meets GNG. Not sure where the nom sees WP:PROMO. Longhornsg (talk) 01:49, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.