Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parimatch (company)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. But the article is still in a very bad shape. Geschichte (talk) 21:17, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Parimatch (company)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Okay, I'll bite the bullet and take a stab... Promo piece on a betting company of no particular notability. References look plentiful but consist of non-RS sources, interviews, sponsorship announcements, press release regurgitations, etc., and at least a couple of articles about the CEO (which isn't what this article is about) — cannot see anything even remotely RS sigcov. Has been previously deleted via PROD and then restored. Nevertheless fails WP:GNG / WP:COMPANY. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:53, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:53, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:53, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:53, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:53, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cyprus-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:53, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:53, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as a case of WP:PROMO. This promotional article was created and edited by a number of undeclared paid editors who based the article upon promotional and unreliable sources so WP:CORPDEPTH is not passed in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 01:25, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Looking at the article, not considering if there is UPE or not, there is good coverage in Men's Health and it's not only about the CEO, it does talk about the company too. Also, McGregor and Tyson have been ambassador's of the company and there is news on that. Webmaster862 (talk) 09:15, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep. This betting company is the biggest in CIS region and one of the biggest betting and gambling player in Europe. It's a leader in Ukraine in its niche as well as in a few other countries. The recent sponsorship with Juventus F.C and other major players in plenty of other sports (especially cyber one) contributes heavily to the company's notability. I've also added some new links and facts to improve the checkability of the page. Lakomyu Kusochek (talk) 11:41, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 19:02, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 21:23, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Per WP:HEY and reasons above. Article is good enough to pass WP:GNG. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 10:00, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Passes WP:GNG and new sources were added.FiddleheadLady (talk) 16:04, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Sources have been added, and I think the contextualisation from Lakomyu Kusochek above is important. /Julle (talk) 08:58, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, as new sources are enough for notability.Jackattack1597 (talk) 15:31, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.