Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parahat Jumanazarow

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:50, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Parahat Jumanazarow[edit]

Parahat Jumanazarow (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Concern was Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. PROD was contested by the articles creator on the grounds that the Turkmen top flight is fully pro, an assertion not supported by reliable sources at WP:FPL or elsewhere. Sir Sputnik (talk) 02:12, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 02:13, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 04:41, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 04:41, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 04:41, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
In the past, consensus has been that matches in national or continental cup competitions do not confer notability per WP:NFOOTY unless both clubs involved play in fully pro leagues. (For recent-ish examples see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rolandas Baravykas and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lewis Page). Sir Sputnik (talk) 14:51, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.