Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PBR Top 30

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Professional Bull Riders. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:17, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

PBR Top 30[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This page was WP:BLARred by VickKiang with the rationale all of the refs are non-independent and are from PBR. Refs I can found mention this in a few sentences while covering other subjects and does not pass SIGCOV IMO. I do largely agree with that rationale; however, I am bringing this here (a) procedurally because I don't think that there is a good target for the redirect and (b) if that is the case and this page has contested notability then the page might be best as deleted. TartarTorte 22:40, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports and United States of America. TartarTorte 22:40, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people, Internet, and Lists. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:47, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect and potentially merge anything worth saving to Professional Bull Riders seems like a good solution to me. Pichpich (talk) 19:55, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.