Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OviLex

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 22:03, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OviLex[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Fails GNG/NCORP. Bordorline promotional. SD0001 (talk) 17:25, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This article is about a relatively large company that makes popular games on Android and iOS. There is a similar article on SCS Software. In the meantime, I'll find more references. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7F:4872:8600:5434:7A32:496E:784D (talk) 17:30, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:34, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:36, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 21:35, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - spam-like, with weak sourcing that includes Twitter, Facebook and blogs. - Biruitorul ^Talk 01:03, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - The article is poorly written, which would not merit deletion. However, there are very few, if any secondary sources that support this companies notability. The only sources I could find even mentioning OviLex were promotional in nature, and written about the video games they create, not talking about the company itself. Jcmcc (Talk) 10:56, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I'll see if I can find other sources that relate to the company itself. However please consider other wikipedia articles that do not have references, rather than targeting this one. In the meantime, I have sent an email to the company's website requesting a detailed company history.(Talk)
- Right, because a company-emailed company history just screams “significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject”. - Biruitorul ^Talk 10:14, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Article just doesn't seem to pass WP:GNG. Videogameplayer99 (talk) 20:27, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.