Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Out of the Dust (band)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎. Star Mississippi 23:39, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Out of the Dust (band)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Does not pass WP:BAND under any criterion. Does not pass GNG either. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 07:35, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Christianity. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 07:35, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:51, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as has coverage in multiple reliable sources such as Cross Rhythms and CCM (magazine) already referenced in the article as per Wikipedia:WikiProject Christian music/Sources. This piece is clearly significant coverage here. Havent done a full search yet, imv, Atlantic306 (talk) 19:42, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
For WP:BAND and for GNG, coverage must be multiple. Have you found anything beyond that Cross Rhythms coverage? I didn't. (I don't think the CCM review counts as it is not clearly independent nor significant). Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 20:09, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 15:37, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Agree the CCM source isn't great, other coverage here,here, and here, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 22:25, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:44, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. A analysis of sources brought into this discussion by Atlantic306 would be helpful in determining whether or not this band passes GNG.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:06, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.