Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Orit Fuchs (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:53, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orit Fuchs

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject fails WP:NARTIST and WP:ANYBIO. Many of these sources are not independent of the subject, as they are promotional puffery. Indeed, this article has been deleted before. Some of the sources are mere mentions, ROUTINE announcements of an exhibition, etc. None are in-depth coverage about her independent of her. The article author has yet to disclose. Chris Troutman (talk) 23:41, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists, Women, and Israel. Chris Troutman (talk) 23:41, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The Jerusalem Post is a brief mention of her, but I don't find anything else. She isn't in Getty ULAN. Oaktree b (talk) 00:30, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Oaktree b: The Jerusalem Post is brief? Please check out again because it is clear that the coverage is significantly! Anyway, because of her exhibitions, he does not pass #4 of WP:NARTIST?Azarkhe (talk) 00:45, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It's five sentences and pictures of her artworks, it's not at all an extensive history of her personal life or work history. And there is only one source for her exhibits, so we can't confirm the rest. One show doesn't make you notable. Oaktree b (talk) 12:56, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Oaktree b: for all of exhibitions I should provide sources?Azarkhe (talk) 13:52, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It would help yes, we require sources for all information presented here. Oaktree b (talk) 13:54, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Oaktree b: By Googling, I found some of sources to show the presenting exhibitions. Could you kindly re-check out the article?Azarkhe (talk) 16:41, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Most of these appear to be commercial galleries and not art museums. These are basically to promote selling her art, not useful for GNG here in wikipedia I'm afraid. Oaktree b (talk) 16:54, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No museum exhibitions or collections. Current unsourced list of "Selected Exhibitions" are for group shows at commercial galleries. Fails WP:NARTIST WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 02:16, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - This is the second go-around for this non-notable artist who does not meet our criteria for WP:GNG nor WP:NARTIST. The depth of coverage is still not there; five sentences and a few photos does not meet the bar. There are no museum collections or serious art historical reviews. It was suggested at the last AfD that this be salted as PROMO, I agree with that, as it seems to be the work of a PR firm or UPE. Netherzone (talk) 14:03, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Dear @Onel5969:, I have faith in you and your idea about articles. Could you let us know what you think? For example if you comment Delete, I will make sure and I will commnet Delete, too. All the best. Azarkhe (talk) 16:48, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Azarkhe It's not allowed to canvas specific users to a Deletion discussion. See WP:CANVASSING. Cielquiparle (talk) 19:56, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Dubious notability, zero hits from reliable sources on Google. -FASTILY 02:28, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 00:57, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, salt and follow up on possible UPE - still lacking mandatory significant coverage. --Orange Mike | Talk 02:00, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.