Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Organized crime in the transport industry

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  JGHowes  talk 02:33, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Organized crime in the transport industry[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

Organized crime in the transport industry (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't know what this is. There is nothing connecting one sentence to another nor the sources to the text. ... discospinster talk 23:11, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. ... discospinster talk 23:11, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. ... discospinster talk 23:11, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy keep. Nothing in the nominaton is a valid reason for deletion. AfD is not for cleanup. - The Bushranger One ping only 00:15, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong keep This article has been referred to Zahoruk, London Metropolitan Police, (CHS26854-21-01-29) for those wishing to comment or add additional notes here, please confirm user telephone number at Metropolitan Police (@metpoliceuk) · Twitter
  • I will provide my telephone number to anyone who wishes to discuss this matter, including the lack of services for deaf, dumb and blind, and AFD on my user page.
  • The article is deeply connected to the origins Bulletin Board System (I will use the talk page for more considerations for investigators yet I am only one person.) The page is safe and effective for use. The hardening of the policy hasn't been explained in terms of Export controls and Vaccination bans. The UK is supplying Wikipedia with a vast variety of content for use but nobody wants a Vaccine trade war. There is no end in sight of potential links between Organized crime in the transport industry and abuse of the early days of Bulletin Board Sysop privileges between loss of consumer medical data on malware-infected computer terminals and transfers overseas of personal medical data via illegal and dangerous espionage. I will provide references to these items at the bottom of this page. Adding the need for references to AFD deletion discussion pages and will discuss this at next month's @2600 meeting unless it has been postponed due to the pandemic but I will travel if I really have to by air to prove in a court of law (the April Toronto Finch courthouse trial that this involves) concerning the tow-truck industry, the abandonment of the combustion-powered Mustang by Ford and continued abuse of newcomer Wikipedians by admins without consideration of disability or access. --LED BodyBuilding (talk) 00:35, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment The original talk page for Organized crime in the transport industry was blanked by the complainant in this matter in a rejection of the requirements that the page not be blanked. This AfD (Articles for Deletion) process must be suspended. --LED BodyBuilding (talk) 02:43, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep or at the very least Draftify, there is no valid reason for deletion proposed by the nominator. Article is properly sourced and passes WP:GNG. JayJayWhat did I do? 03:19, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment, despite the warning by the template, a user has nuked the page. If we are starting from scratch, so be it. I will begin the process of adding sound common sense information that may or may not require further collaboration by the team of users here, who despite earlier misgivings, seem to want to provide a place and time for editing and contributions of an important issue. --LED BodyBuilding (talk) 09:31, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Patent nonsense. The topic may be notable, and a proper article could be written l, but this useless pile of junk is not needed. The article creator seems to lack a fundamental understanding of not just how Wikipedia works, but its purpose from looking at their contribution history. Seems to lack the competency needed here. oknazevad (talk) 09:54, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. I think this could be a useful article, since the topic is clearly notable, but right now we have to restore the pages and protect it. Bearian (talk) 20:34, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • TNT: I moved the article from its orginial title and thought about AfD for TNT. There is a useful article here, but it is unacceptable as written and it will take far more time to attempt a rewrite than it will be to start over fresh. Since it has already been stubbed, the only question is should the history be kept; since it will be a completely new article I think the history is not useful.  // Timothy :: talk  12:39, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - There may be a notable topic here, but this is 100% not the start of such an article. At the time of nomination, it was a rambling mess. After removal of the nonsense, the article is essentially a tautology. There is nothing to save here for the start of a real article. -- Whpq (talk) 18:08, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as patent nonsense. Mccapra (talk) 09:04, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong Delete per WP:TNT, WP:BLP, WP:BLPCRIME and WP:PATENT. The article in the page history is completely incomprehensible patent nonsense full of unsourced allegations and conspiracy theories, written in such poor English that it is basically impossible to understand.
The article started by introducing the topic as "Transport industry organized crime is the worldwide underground trade-in information, access, and gossip related to the theft of transportation and technology." which is nonsensical, what does "trade in gossip" mean and why is it illegal? How is technology related to this?
What on earth is "The failure of Moore's Law in application to the technology used in telecommunications and the wholesale loss of traditional North American security principles for inside corporate security meant the RJ10 connector, itself a relic of eras past, rendered the safety and security of apartments under the auspices of USMCA contracts a sticking point for the new administration of Joe Biden. Everything from emergency services to consumer home package and courier delivery was considered a weak point in growing disputes with China." supposed to mean, and why is it related to transport crime? There are entire sections of the article full of similar content that make no sense at all.
The article also contains a load of unsourced conspiracy theory rubbish which violates WP:BLP and WP:BLPCRIME, such as the statement "In the Greater Toronto Area, the Panama Papers revealed that decades of insider access by government-connected employees created a dangerous web of fraudulent activity, international identity theft, homicide and arson among other instances of criminal activity, of which there are many, of grievous harm." sourced to this news article about some gang members torching each others trucks which does not substantiate these serious allegations.
There may be a notable topic here, but this article is so poor that it is unsalvageable. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 16:12, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Organized_crime_in_the_transport_industry&oldid=1004921403"