Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Onewheel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. MelanieN (talk) 00:15, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Onewheel

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

On the list Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Orangemoody/Articles. Doesn't seem to meet the criteria for notability. TJH2018 talk 18:44, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:21, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – The topic passes WP:GNG. Source examples include, but are not limited to those listed below. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:24, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References

Sports Illustrated
Business Insider
Popular Mechanics
The Mercury News
Santa Cruz Sentinel
Missoula Independent
NBC Montana
TechCrunch

Keep per the sources found by Northamerica1000. While the article needs to be expanded, there is more than enough coverage to meet notability requirements. Spirit of Eagle (talk) 06:01, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 16:58, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per the sources found by NA1k - As noted above it needs expanding however notability's certainly there. –Davey2010^Talk 21:52, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.