Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olamide 'Kola' Aina

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Barkeep49 (talk) 02:09, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Olamide 'Kola' Aina (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

After observing it had been flagged for notability & promo related issues I did a before search & it revealed that subject of the article lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of him thus doesn’t satisfy WP:GNG. Celestina007 (talk) 10:59, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 10:59, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 10:59, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 10:59, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 10:59, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 10:59, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 10:59, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Source assessment table:
Source Independent? Reliable? Significant coverage? Count source toward GNG?
Nigerian Star Yes Yes No A list article which doesn’t satisfy WP:SIGCOV in any way. No
Kola Aina, CEO of Emerging Platforms Group is holding an AMA next Wednesday on Radar No Appears to be a sponsored post so it isn’t independent of the subject No A combination of an announcement & a sponsored post Yes No
Here are 28 tech entrepreneurs that made the presidential advisory group Yes Yes No A list article of 28 persons with very short biographies below their name entry, which in no way satisfies WP:SIGCOV hence has no value to WP:GNG. No
Kola Aina, Kola Oyeneyin, Mohammed Jega, Others appointed into Tech + creativity Advisory Group Yes No Yet to develop a record for fact checking No This re-echoes the source no 3(above) already analyzed above but this time it doesn’t even discuss subject of our article hence of 0 value toward satisfying WP:GNG No
2020 Fellows No It appears as though any member can login and edit their profile. No if it isn’t independent of the subject it is not considered reliable & is of no use to WP: GNG No Yet another list article in which the subject isn’t discussed with in-depth significant coverage. No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.
  • Comment — Above are the analysis of the sources used in the article. Celestina007 (talk) 11:06, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • I do understand that the subject lacks in-depth coverage. However, I still believe that he has made much impact by investing in Nigerian startups like Paystack that was recently acquired for more than 200million dollars by a US-based payment company called Stripe.[1] I will suggest that it be kept and add the bio stub template {{bio stub}} to it for further improvement. Uzoma Ozurumba (talk) 11:51, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Uzoma Ozurumba, sorry for the confusion there, the article was indeed created by a certain editor named Blossom Ozurumba, the eerie similar name got me confused. In any case my argument is still very much valid. Celestina007 (talk) 17:25, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Furthermore, a portion of your comment above reads; I do understand that the subject lacks in-depth coverage. However, I still believe that he has made much impact by investing in Nigerian startups like Paystack that was recently acquired for more than 200million dollars, I simply don’t understand that thought process, if you know for a fact that as you have stated above that the subject of our discussion lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources that is required in WP:GNG why then would you argue in favor for a premature article? if you re-read WP:BIO or WP:GNG, you’d observe that investing in startup companies is never a criterion nor a yardstick used in determining notability of an individual. I’ve done a WP:BEFORE & a source assessment already, what else do I have to do? This is not even bother-line/bare notability this is an outright GNG fail. Celestina007 (talk) 19:51, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • I apologise Celestina007 for putting the template and stressing you out, I will immediately remove it. Thank you.Uzoma Ozurumba (talk) 17:13, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • I don’t get what template you speak of. I only pointed out to you an invalid argument you made by suggesting that the article is notable because he invested money in a startup company & I corrected you by telling you no notability criterion validates/substantiates your rationale. Celestina007 (talk) 20:46, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.