Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OMTJ
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:31, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- OMTJ (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable designation for a member of a non-notable organization. The Knights Templar ceased to be a meaningful organization over 700 years ago; any of the dozens of modern organizations using the name would need to demonstrate their own notability, which this one has not. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 21:23, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:GNG,no secondary sources.Lsmll 07:47, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eduemoni↑talk↓ 05:06, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No evidence of notability for this designation by an organisation whose page is itself a redirect to a section in another article. AllyD (talk) 06:13, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.