Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Norabadi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete per WP:CSD#G4 (recreation of previously deleted article). —David Eppstein (talk) 00:30, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Norabadi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This has been removed before (see Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Nosratallah_Khakian, due to lack of notability. Author contested delete in talk page and an IP with no edits removed template without explaining why. Ξnvelope Salad {^T_C} 14:18, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DeleteIn the absence of sources or any sign of actual notability StuartDouglas (talk) 15:38, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 17:32, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 17:32, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 17:32, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 17:32, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The deletion log shows that an article on "Nosratollah Khakian" has already been deleted once as a CSD G4 since the AfD decision in December 2012. It is unclear why it has been created under the current title this time, as the word "Norabadi" does not occur in the article. It would be worthwhile if an Admin can check whether this text is sufficiently close to the previous "Nosratollah Khakian" article in which case it can be a CSD G4 (and salt). Either way, as per the previous AfD, there is no evidence of notability. AllyD (talk) 20:06, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Also worth noting Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kamran1370/Archive indicating a consistent history of new editors recreating this biographical article under various titles. AllyD (talk) 20:10, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy/Snow Delete -- recent delete vote with previous support all being IP/Sockpuppet. AfD on Farsi WP resulted in delete. -- Michael Scott Cuthbert (talk) 21:44, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

According to prominent articles and academic sources

Karbram Hello! Wikipedia has an article on the merits, as the owner of a prominent academic and reputable sources. Thank you.2.179.161.184 (talk) 19:58, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.