Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/No More Dead Dogs (2nd nomination)
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Per WP:SNOW - nominator presented the only "delete" rationale. (non-admin closure) SWik78 (talk • contribs) 17:19, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No More Dead Dogs[edit]
AfDs for this article:
- No More Dead Dogs (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Article doesn't state notability of subject. Call me Bubba (talk) 20:36, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep—Favorably reviewed book with plenty of sources available, including many google book hits. Won 2003 Young Reader's Choice Award.—RJH (talk) 21:48, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, not sure what the nominator is saying by "it doesn't state notability of subject"... Its a novel and has won a couple of awards and there is plenty of sources out there for it. I actually read the book a few years back (although I don't really remember it). Tavix (talk) 22:45, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 00:50, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep—Favourably reviewed, winner of the aforementioned award. Article could do with further clean-ups beyond what I did the other night, and more references particularly to the prize-winning, but it shows promise. Ianjm (talk) 01:08, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - I added two reliable source reviews to the article, this article clearly passes several requirements of WP:BK.--Captain-tucker (talk) 01:38, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Ditto most of the above reasons. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 15:41, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep— Favourably reviewed --Twilight Wolf 64 (talk) 16:47, 19 December 2008 (UTC) — Twilight Wolf 64 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
- Keep Notability is not at issue. Ecoleetage (talk) 22:43, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.