Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nischal (actor)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. MBisanz ^talk 13:52, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nischal (actor)

Still not notable; prevoius AFD was finished with No Consensus, article is written like an advertisement, possible copyvio, possible hoax, none of the movies he's been in have wiki articles ( i couldn't even find some of them on IMDB), long list of problems. - -' The Spook (TALK) _{(Share the Love with Barnstars)} 18:37, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: previous AFD is here. - -' The Spook (TALK) _{(Share the Love with Barnstars)} 18:44, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:03, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:28, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unless citations from reliable sources are added to comply with the verifiability policy. Verifiability is the only problem here; if everything in the article was true, it would be an obvious keep. Stifle (talk) 14:21, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. There are a few more mentions of the subject available online since the last AfD, all in the context of an anticipated marriage to Kavya Madhavan. See here, here, here, and here. It's sad to say that this represents an improvement in the level of coverage that's available, but there you are. I'm neutral on this out of respect for the fact that there's probably a bit of systemic/language bias at play, but I recognize that it is going to be difficult to find reliable sources to write much of an article, especially as the subject seems to have left the film industry. Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 16:52, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 16:54, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 16:54, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and actresses-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 04:19, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep AFD initiated by blocked sockpuppeter. Grsz ¹¹ ^→Review! 15:45, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per the results of the last AfD and the sources offered by Xymmax, as diligent searches can establish his notability as a child star, even if not adult. And since notability is not temporary, ipso-facto, he's still notable, even if no longer in film and even though he has no new notability in his subsequent career. Apart from this, I am most disturbed by this AfD being tainted as having been nominated by a user now blocked for puppetry. Past my earlier comments, one has think toward the nom's motivations. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 06:27, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.