Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nina Mirembe

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 18:30, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

Nina Mirembe

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Nina Mirembe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A non-notable model with no significant coverage in reliable sources and current sources are either passing mentions, interviews or unreliable. Fails WP:NMODEL GSS ^💬 12:01, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. GSS ^💬 12:01, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GSS ^💬 12:01, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

@GSS: Why India? 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 16:17, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

Ahh thanks for pointing out this looks like an silly mistake. GSS ^💬 16:25, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

Delete Not a notable personality. Not much different sources available as well. Ashishkafle (talk) 13:09, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:05, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

• Delete if you do not win the national beauty contest you are almost never notable, even if you win the national contest that is not a default sign of notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:43, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 16:18, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

• Keep per WP:GNG. There are sufficient sources which cover her in detail. See [1], [2], [3]. We should be mindful that there is a systematic bias against non-western biographies. This appears to be a notable figure in her own society with a sufficient amount of in-depth sources to demonstrate it.--User:Namiba 17:40, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

The first source you mentioned above is an interview, the second one is pr piece and I'm not even sure if the source is even reliable under WP:RS and the third one again looks like a pr piece and none of them satisfy WP:GNG. GSS ^💬 17:51, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination.--Surv1v4l1st ^{▌Talk|Contribs▌} 23:51, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
• Keep Notable personality in her society. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sidedeans (talk • contribs) — Sidedeans (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 03:43, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.