Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nikhil Prasad

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Karikku. Daniel (talk) 04:30, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nikhil Prasad[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG nothing more then outside his company. Behind the moors (talk) 15:20, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Behind the moors (talk) 15:20, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Behind the moors (talk) 15:20, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kerala-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:35, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Karikku. No reason for separate bio from company. Pikavoom (talk) 10:52, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I am the author of the article, Nikhil Prasad is the first ever person who founded a digital platform in Kerala and established it as the top digital company. He is the only one who written, directed, produced, edited the videos for Karikku. The page Karikku and even their web series Thera Para as notable as here on Wikipedia. Nikhil Prasad is the only man behind these, He is not only the founder, but also the creative head of it. In my personal opinion he falls under WP:CREATIVE. Can we keep it? Thank you, happy editing Onmyway22 talk 07:07, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tell us exactly which point of WP:CREATIVE is matched and how? Behind the moors (talk) 08:25, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Eevee01^(talk) 11:30, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The photograph of Nikhil Prasad seems to have been made with the man's cooperation. I see that it was uploaded by Onmyway22, creator of the article. This makes me wonder if Onmyway22 might know Nikhil Prasad. -- Hoary (talk) 12:07, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It took days to contact him via LinkedIn. To get permission to use his image in Wikipedia to avoid copyright. I got an image and permission to use it as a free file. That's all. I believe that an article without an image is incomplete. You can check my previous image uploads I contribute images (by taking them directly that I can access) for articles that don't have an image. As I got a copyright message earlier, In his case, I tried to avoid copyright by not using his image from public sources. To conclude, this is not about a conflict of interest, It is all about my effort and time to create this. That is why I asked for help in TH. Please do not misunderstand. I am just waiting for other's votes to conclude. Onmyway22 talk 13:34, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment His only claim to fame is Karikku. Thera Para is a subset of Karikku and I can assure you it will not result in a keep if somebody nominates it for a deletion. He is not the first person to start a digital platform in Kerala, though he indeed is the founder of one of the more popular platforms. Probably a deletion or at best a redirect is in order. Jupitus Smart 18:13, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwaiiplayer (talk) 13:44, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Karikku. Karikku is, at best, marginally notable, but as long as that article exists, it makes sense to redirect this title there. Prasad does not meet WP:CREATIVE nor WP:BASIC. --bonadea contributions talk 14:34, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.