Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nigel Peake

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Although GNG was never specifically mentioned, it appears from the keep arguments that it is likely to meet that guideline. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 14:31, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nigel Peake[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD declined, there's no indication that Peake is notable per the biographical or general notability guidelines because of a lack of significant coverage in independent, reliable sources. The "silver commendation" alone is not enough to establish notability. SITH (talk) 12:49, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. SITH (talk) 12:49, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Although the present article text's focus on student work contains little to suggest notability, the subject may be more prominent as an artist/illustrator: 2005 exhibition article, 2016 exhibition article. His career to date probably falls short of WP:NARTIST but it is another angle worth taking into account so I am tagging the Visual Arts project. AllyD (talk) 16:29, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 16:29, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:46, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete He does not meet any of the ways for notability as an artist.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:22, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 (talk) 15:40, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I agree with AllyD that there is evidence that he is better known as an artist, in various media. Architectural Digest had an article about his tableware designs [1]; Wall Street Journal covered his wallpaper [2] and his crystal glassware [3], which was also covered in Wallpaper* [4], Interior Design [5] and Surface magazine [6]. There are a lot of other Google News results too. I think it will be worth checking if his works are held in the permanent collections of any galleries. Given that this article is new, it's surprising that it doesn't mention any of this - but it should certainly be added. RebeccaGreen (talk) 12:02, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:05, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. There's also a The Morning News (online magazine) article[7] to go with all the others. Clarityfiend (talk) 09:15, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.