Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicky Salapu

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep per general consensus. (non-admin closure) 141Pr {contribs/Best page} 07:31, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nicky Salapu[edit]

Nicky Salapu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 15:50, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Oceania. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 15:50, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 16:14, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, has significant global coverage such as this, this, and this, even if most of it is for the famous 31-0 loss America Samoa faced.--Ortizesp (talk) 18:42, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - Besides the sources on th page already and the sources Ortizesp found, I found 10 (which goes through his playing career abroad), 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, among many many more sources. He has also been interviewed on many podcasts and YouTube channels (18, 19, 20, 21 etc. Clearly significant figure in Pacific Islands and American Samoan football, the most-capped American Samoa national team player of all time, and one of few to ever leave American Samoa and play abroad (he played in Australia and USA). Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 21:34, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per sources above which show notability. GiantSnowman 22:45, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - there are clearly a significant number of reliable, independent sources establishing notability, and I am surprised the nominator did not bother to look for them. I've added some of those linked above into the article.--IdiotSavant (talk) 23:00, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per above, per passing GNG, @Sportsfan 1234: What's with the half assed nomination? Did you bother doing a WP:BEFORE?? Das osmnezz presented how many cites here?? Some good some bad, but still, this tells me you're not doing AfD justice here, are you trying to waste peoples time? Govvy (talk) 09:06, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. I thought his international record and his involvement in that 31–0 loss were already more than enough to fulfill WP:GNG, weren't they? Oltrepier (talk) 13:28, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per the above comments; the article passes WP:GNG. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 17:08, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.