Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Newgen Software Tech

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. This consensus has be muddied by the sock farm which targeted this discussion, but there is a clear delete consensus reached by uninvolved editors and this consensus is in keeping with the consensus reached at similar AfDs over a number of years. Barkeep49 (talk) 01:42, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Newgen Software Tech

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While this has lots of sources, it does not appear to have overall context or explanations. Being on the stock market does not inherently make one notable. Ask me about air Cryogenic air (talk) 18:31, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 January 4. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 18:51, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and India. Shellwood (talk) 20:14, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Clerk note: This AfD was filed by a suspected sock campaign, which has voted "keep" here. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Darshak.parmar. --TheSandDoctor ^Talk 20:48, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

Keep There are sufficient sources to establish that this company meets WP:NCORP. Also added more information (context and did some explanation) but yes there's more contributions needed on the page. but i might it shouldn't be deleted as it is listed on BSE and NSE (stock market) and having more reliable sources.:Hayraan Aashna (talk) 09:48, 6 January 2023 (UTC) Clerk note: Blocked suspected sock of Darshak.parmar and confirmed sock of Munshi Talab. --TheSandDoctor ^Talk 20:48, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify Although the company gets a fair amount of coverage, the page creator should give some time to improve it to show why the company is notable. M.Ashraf333 (talk) 12:20, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Very strong keep Theis passes WP:NCORP, It shouldn't be deleted as listed on the BSE, and NSE is a credible assertion of importance Munshi Talab (talk) 10:14, 9 January 2023 (UTC) Clerk note: Blocked suspected sock of Darshak.parmar and confirmed to Hayraan Aashna. --TheSandDoctor ^Talk 20:48, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Allow the creators time to improve the article. Darshak Parmar (talk) 12:29, 9 January 2023 (UTC) Clerk note: Suspected sock master, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Darshak.parmar. --TheSandDoctor ^Talk 20:48, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 20:34, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep The article is well-sourced, reliable, and exudes notability. JRed176 (talk) 20:45, 11 January 2023 (UTC) Clerk note: Suspected sock of Darshak.parmar. --TheSandDoctor ^Talk 20:48, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - due to a lack of WP:CORPDEPTH in multiple independent and reliable sources, per WP:NCORP. An online search find press releases and trivial coverage that often appears based on press releases. This article appears to be WP:PROMO and the encyclopedia should be protected from it. Beccaynr (talk) 21:37, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Checkuser note: The closing administrator may find this SPI interesting... firefly ( t · c ) 08:49, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure how to list previous AFDs but according to info at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Newgen Software (2nd nomination), this is the 7th AFD on this company. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:07, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:NCORP. Clear evidence of socking in this AfD, plus the six previous AfDs, as noted by Liz. BubbaJoe123456 (talk) 17:23, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:NCORP and WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 19:56, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.