Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Newcastle & Hunter Rugby League

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Hut 8.5 21:36, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Newcastle & Hunter Rugby League[edit]

Newcastle & Hunter Rugby League (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No notability. A local league with zero coverage. Abbottonian (talk) 17:13, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 18:11, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 18:11, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This competition is very popular and important to the Hunter region. I suggest you view the 2016 Grand Final, Shortland v Windale on you tube, which was broadcasted by BarTV. You will see that there is a large crowd and that the coverage itself gives the competition notability. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eladnara (talkcontribs) 23:12, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

To prove notability, you must cite reliable references on page. Here's how to: Help:Introduction to referencing. Abbottonian (talk) 04:25, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:28, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cavarrone 08:33, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:58, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.