Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nevzorov Haute Ecole

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. For the avoidance of doubt, nothing in this closure prevents the normal editorial actions of merging or redirecting from being taken. Stifle (talk) 11:58, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nevzorov Haute Ecole

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable riding school, WP:PROMO and WP:FRINGE. No hits in Google news archive, no hits on News, no in-depth coverage in independent sources that I can find. Most of the sources in the article are either self-published or irrelevant. "NHE" in the article creator's username may indicate a conflict of interest. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:07, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:36, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:36, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or Merge: per WP:GNG and WP:FRINGE; all I can find are in-house web pages and self-published materials other than this. That said, may want to extend an offer to allow the lead editor to have the article userfied on his/her talk page as a sandbox, they put a fair bit of work into it. Though claiming to be Natural horsemanship, this is fringe even by the NH standard. Montanabw ^(talk) 02:00, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:20, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as not notable. Kierzek (talk) 14:54, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect and very selectively merge some of the sourcing here (such as the Horses for Life cites) to Alexander Nevzorov, where this is already covered. --Arxiloxos (talk) 18:04, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. There appear to be a number of offline and/or Russian-language sources, including those cited in the article. It's not surprising that coverage of this school would be minimal in English-language media, but there is enough for a decent article. --Sammy1339 (talk) 00:39, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- I like the idea of merging into the Alexander Nevzorov article. Tweaking my !vote accordingly. It's pretty much a one-person gig. Montanabw ^(talk) 03:33, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:36, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.