Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naya Dane (singer)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Sources have been provided, and not rebutted; promotional material seems to have been dumped. Vanamonde (Talk) 23:36, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Naya Dane (singer)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NMUSICBIO and was rejected twice in AFC earlier [1] TheChronium 08:20, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. TheChronium 08:20, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. ^{Engr. Smitty Werben} 12:37, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. ^{Engr. Smitty Werben} 12:37, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

~~Weak~~ Keep There's a few Nigerian music sources like TooXclusive,[2] City People Magazine,[3] and Hip Hop World Magazine.[4] I don't know any of these but they're apparently notable publications. This seems like enough to meet gng. The page needs some work but I've already cleaned it up a lot. BuySomeApples (talk) 21:30, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete — Per apt rationale by TheChronium I’m an expert in Nigeria-related sources and I can say expressly say that none of the sources used in the article establish notability. A before search turns up nothing cogent. Celestina007 (talk) 23:21, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 02:11, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per BuySomeApples. Seems to have enough independent RS to pass criteria 1 WP:NMUSICBIO. Celestina007's and the nominator's arguments are not convincing. We have three independent publications with reasonably in-depth coverage, and said sources are quality enough to have their own wikipedia pages and are independently notable media. I'm not seeing anything about the publications themselves to indicate they are unreliable, so in the absence of a cogent argument for deletion it's a keep.4meter4 (talk) 23:04, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Curbon7 (talk) 05:10, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - promotional article by blocked COI account. Best to not waste proper volunteers' time with spam like this. MrsSnoozyTurtle 06:04, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per BuySomeApples and 4meter4. Celestina007 hasn't stated why articles in three notable publications don't establish notability. NemesisAT (talk) 11:20, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.