Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nawab Jassi Khan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. and then Redirect to Sudhan#History and particulars. Redirect page protected from editing by new editors. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:54, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nawab Jassi Khan

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Recreated not too long after a recent AfD where the consensus was to delete; clearly fails WP:GNG. Patient Zero^talk 23:45, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Pakistan. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:15, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - also the redirects are making this confusing. Dazzling4 (talk) 03:50, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and redirect - as earlier. Can the admins also full-protect the redirect so that it doesn't get edited again? There are powerful tribal affinities and folklores at play. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 12:40, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment this title has already been redirected to Sudhan#History and particulars, meaning that either this AfD is moot or the redirect needs to be to allow completion of the AfD. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 02:52, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not exactly moot. There are frequent attempts to turn it into a full-fledged page. Even now, the redirect page has content, if you notice. It was deleted, but people inserted some content again after the AfD was filed. The redirect page needs to be full-protected or at least EC-protected given that this topic falls under WP:ARBIPA. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 09:36, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and then redirect and protect. If a properly sourced article ever develops at the target, it can go through AfC. // Timothy :: talk 16:30, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.