Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Water Life Saving Association Republic of China

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. RL0919 (talk) 21:59, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

National Water Life Saving Association Republic of China

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced article; I couldn't establish notability. Boleyn (talk) 21:35, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Taiwan-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 22:03, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 22:05, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I found an English-language newspaper article and a Chinese-language master's thesis that ought to establish notability. This article discusses the teaching activities related to swimming and lifesaving of a Taiwanese couple who are the heads of the Chinese Taipei Water Life Saving Association and the association’s Taipei City Eastern Area branch. respectively. This master's thesis isn't online, but from the metadata shown, I think it is likely to have a lot of information on the association, since you couldn't write a history of lifesaving in Taiwan without giving appropriate coverage to the association's work. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 22:49, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per the significant coverage in reliable sources found by Eastmain, which is enough to pass Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline. I also found this brief entry in a book. Cunard (talk) 11:28, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per sources found by Eastmain. Thanks VocalIndia (talk) 10:54, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.