Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammed Aminu Baka

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 22:31, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mohammed Aminu Baka

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Possible covert upe of a non notable “businessman morgul” “philanthropist” and “politician” who lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them thus fails GNG. Per WP:NPOL he also doesn’t qualify as he is a mere aspirant to be a governor. Celestina007 (talk) 17:02, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 17:02, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 17:02, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 17:02, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 17:02, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 17:02, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 17:02, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Pure PROMO, a smattering of pieces related to the candidacy in 2019, but nothing further AFAICS, insufficient RS to pass GNG. Regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 21:45, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Woefully badly sourced article which fails to demonstrate passing of WP:BIO, nor WP:NPOL. True notability is neither asserted nor verified. References are WP:PRIMARY or failed links or fail other verification. Instead of being an article this looks more like the background for an election campaign document. In short it is WP:ADMASQ Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^{Talk to me} 08:29, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:BIO, WP:NPOL, WP:GNG - Lots of unsourced claims, with nothing at all to show any notability. Cheers KylieTastic (talk) 11:14, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: No evidence of notability, purely promotional. We need to take a close look at the editor who created this. --Guy Macon (talk) 14:33, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete It could have also been a speedy delete. Or 'Ultra' delete. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 16:37, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:BIO, WP:NPOL. Powerful Karma (talk) 16:43, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not This WP:BIO qualified as a GNG. Just needs some time to come up with more verifiable and reliable sources. Guy Macon's completely wrong to have said it's purely promotional. And again how sure are you, that the topic/subject has no evidence of notability? And why take a close look at me? Sorry to say, Am I a criminal and you, a detective? We're all Wikipedians. There should be a sense of belonging here.

Thank you, Celestina007. You're the only one that seems to have understood me. You're so kind.

I, most humbly, requests that the article; Mohammed Aminu Baka not be given a speedy deletion. With time, it'll be well-sourced beyond Wikipedia's eye; dazzling. And lest y'll forget, it's not a background of a political campaign. Most important thing is for Wikipedia audience to know of this subject's bio.

I therefore objected to the speedy deletion of

Yours in Wikipedia,

Brainbox (talk) 10:22, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think we need to interpret that as an opinion by the creating editor to Keep the article Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^{Talk to me} 11:21, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.