Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Minister of Everything (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to C. D. Howe. Barkeep49 (talk) 06:01, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Minister of Everything

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged for notability since 2008, this article survived AfD in 2008 but is really a dictionary definition. There’s no real encyclopaedic content. Mccapra (talk) 19:27, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 19:27, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 19:27, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nomination.TH1980 (talk) 03:58, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguate This term is a political term that is used for the reasons as mentioned in the article itself. It is beneficial to have the page as it is, though it might be a better option to remodel this into a disambiguation page.Obinnaonye —Preceding undated comment added 08:14, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I generally concur with the nom that this is a dictionary definition, at best. I looked to see if we had a wikt:Minister of Everything to which we could soft redirect, but alas, found nothing. The disambiguation proposal has potential, and I'd like to see some disambiguation experts like Narky Blert and Crouch, Swale, called in by whoever relists this. Doug Mehus T·C 00:28, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 15:05, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to C. D. Howe. Just because other politicians are occasionally named MoE doesn't make it worth an article or dab page. (Lots of politicians have been called lots of derogatory nicknames too. Should we also have Lying weasel?) None of the other articles, with the exception of Dean Barrow, even mention it. A hatnote in the Howe article could link to Barrow and Walter M. Gibson, the only others to whom the title is seriously applied. Clarityfiend (talk) 20:42, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or Redirect to C D Howe as per Clarityfiend and per WP:WORDISSUBJECT. The phrase does not meet notability grounds. -- Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 14:37, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.