Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Schreiber

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:09, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mike Schreiber[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject fails WP:NHOCKEY. Played three pro seasons in German second and third-leagues. His college awards don't pass #4 past deletions of players with similar honours. Tay87 (talk) 01:32, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Tay87 (talk) 01:32, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Tay87 (talk) 01:32, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. Tay87 (talk) 01:32, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Tay87 (talk) 01:32, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Coverage is typical sports reporting. I wasn't sure what it meant to say he was an "All-American candidate", so I looked at the AHCA All-American team for the 2009-10 season. He was not among the 8 defensemen listed, meaning he didn't make the first or second All-American team from the East. Being all conference is insufficient to show notability and he doesn't meet any other criteria at WP:NHOCKEY. Papaursa (talk) 22:01, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Looking through the notability critera for WP:NHOCKEY and he fails in all of them bar rule 4 of the notability but as User:Papaursa brought up, he wasn't listed in the AHCA All-American for that season. So my vote is a delete. HawkAussie (talk) 01:03, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.