Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Lansing Field

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Mojo Hand (talk) 04:51, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mike Lansing Field

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable sports field only mentioned in small local newspapers where there are always slow news days.SparklingPessimist ^{Scream at me!} 01:18, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 11:18, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 11:18, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep It's notable. The page doesn't cite sources, but that doesn't mean they're not out there.[1][2][3][4] – Muboshgu (talk) 17:10, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

those are small local newspapers where nothing noteworthy happens. SparklingPessimist ^{Scream at me!} 17:26, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wyoming-related deletion discussions. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:13, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Former minor league baseball stadium. Minor league baseball stadiums in organized baseball, which this was, are notable. I agree the article could be better written, but AFD is not cleanup. Smartyllama (talk) 13:14, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 00:51, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. This article is informational even though there are no sources. Their Facebook page has been active recently with pictures and scheduled games, which demonstrates this place exists, making it notable. Bmbaker88 (talk) 01:59, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. These local newspapers aren't enough(WP:NOTNEWS).Burning Pillar (talk) 13:33, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. As Smartyllama comments, by long custom we maintain articles for the ballparks of teams in organized baseball; it's encyclopedic information and the completeness of this coverage is essential to its value. Moreover, plenty of reliable sources are apparent, including non-local ones, and the subject passes GNG easily. I've added a few sources to the article. --Arxiloxos (talk) 21:16, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Smartyllama. Lepricavark (talk) 22:03, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.