Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Microsoft Suzhou Office

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Notability concerns weren't addressed. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:39, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Microsoft Suzhou Office[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not seem to meet notability guidelines. No sources are given to indicate how this office is notable itself. First attempt to create this article was speedy deleted as A10 as copied from the Microsoft article; not an outright copy this time, but still no sources given that indicate notability. The few sources given only establish definitions. 331dot (talk) 09:01, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Microsoft Suzhou Office is a new building which was opened at Aug. 2016, it is part of Microsoft Corporation. We will add more materials to this page, but please keep it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ExtractionFresh (talk • contribs) 09:06, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@ExtractionFresh: Who is "we"? Please note that accounts cannot be shared or represent a group. 331dot (talk) 09:08, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

How is this building or office notable on its own? 331dot (talk) 09:09, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot: I will take another picture which has chinese name on the building to replace existing one. And HR department will update this page with more descriptions.

@ExtractionFresh: Do you represent Microsoft, either generally or this particular office? It is a severe conflict of interest for someone associated with Microsoft to be editing any page about its office or offices. 331dot (talk) 09:14, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Along with there being no apparent references, there seems to be a conflict of interest with the primary editor. Anarchyte (work | talk) 11:14, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 13:23, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 13:23, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- an unremarkable regional office of a corporation. Wikipedia is not a recruitment site. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:12, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per above. Neutrality^talk 05:41, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.