Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Rothrock

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 19:47, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Rothrock[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article does not meet WP:GNG, citations do not reflect significant coverage in secondary sources. Also possibly in violation of WP:OR, WP:AUTO. Rosguill^talk 01:10, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 02:05, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 02:05, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 02:06, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, borderline speedy. The Forbes article is by a "contributor" and doesn't even mention this person by name; the other "sources" are even worse. See also Soren Kaplan from the same user, and this list of upBoard managers. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 02:19, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Forbes is good but not enough. Notable if you developed the article and included more citations Freetheangels (talk) 20:41, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:SIGCOV and subsequently WP:BIO. scope_creep (talk) 18:03, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The cited sources are very far from enough to meet WP:GNG, and nothing better found online. Edwardx (talk) 18:41, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Thanks for the feedback. Understood that it fails WP:SIGCOV and will look for more notable references / citations. (Mcvalley) —Preceding undated comment added 15:40, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.