Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mic Check (Short Film)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:41, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 05:37, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Mic Check (Short Film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No reliable, third-party sources have been provided to demonstrate the real-world notability of this feature, whose one weak claim to fame is that it won a prize at an obscure student film festival. PROD tag removed by creator (currently indef-blocked for spamming) with no explanation on talk page or elsewhere. More than one draft copy currently exists at WP:AfC. SuperMarioMan 03:51, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 07:35, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. It is conceivable that even a student short film screened at student film festival in San Diego might have coverage enough to be notable... but not this one. While I did make the article prettier before returning to this discussion, I could not find it being discussed in any reliable sources. Topic fails WP:GNG and WP:NF. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 20:03, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 20:22, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — TheSpecialUser (TSU) 07:57, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.