Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meredith Atwood

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:05, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

Meredith Atwood

Meredith Atwood (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:GNG. These references do not establish notability. ubiquity (talk) 16:50, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 16:52, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

• Delete. Looks like her hometown newspaper, The Augusta Chronicle, did a a brief interview, but that's about all I see. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 11:25, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
• Delete due to lack of sources about her -- nearly everything here is by her, or is a speaking engagement. Not surprisingly, the book appears to have a limited audience (based on library holdings), and I couldn't find any reviews. LaMona (talk) 15:37, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 08:09, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 08:09, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

• Delete - Not even anything considerably better for general notability. SwisterTwister talk 08:09, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
• Do not delete - Over 222 reviews for book on Amazon ; Articles published for over a year in periodical, Triathlete Magazine. Online reference: PS200 19:39, 8 December 2015 (UTC)~~PaigeSterling33~~

PaigeSterling33 -- We do not use amazon customer reviews when judging notability. Those are notoriously unreliable, and often written by friends or even the author him/herself. We only count professional reviews. (Note: PaigeSterling33 is the author of this article.) LaMona (talk) 03:47, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.