Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mathias Ssemanda

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 22:59, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mathias Ssemanda

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Borderline A7 eligible article on a non notable “media strategist” who lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them thus do not satisfy WP: GNG. A before search links me to self published and user generated sources, all of which are not considered reliable. Celestina007 (talk) 22:04, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 22:04, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 22:04, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 22:04, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Uganda-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 23:08, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, does not have significant coverage.--Mvqr (talk) 10:46, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete PR heads for universities are almost never notable. I see nothing that suggests Ssememda is one of the extremely rare exceptions to this rule.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:28, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: coverage is weak and reliable sources not found. TheDreamBoat (talk) 03:12, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.