Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Materia Collective

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:18, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

Materia Collective

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Materia Collective (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This music label does not satisfy WP:NCORP as it lacks multiple reliable secondary sources writing about it in significant detail. The fact that it has notable artists signed to it does not give it notability (no reverse WP:INHERITED). Barkeep49 (talk) 19:10, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Barkeep49 (talk) 19:10, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:38, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:38, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:38, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:39, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

• Support per nom. ~ Dissident93 ^(talk) 20:07, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
• Delete Per nom. Fails WP:NCORP as it does not have significant coverage._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 10:21, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Couldn't find reliable secondary sources with significant detail. Jontesta (talk) 16:28, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Videogameplayer99 (talk) 21:28, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.