Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Massachusetts Seniors Squash Rackets Association

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is that this organization does not meet the general notability guidelines for inclusion in Wikipedia. Malinaccier (talk) 19:11, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Massachusetts Seniors Squash Rackets Association (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NORG and WP:GNG. DrStrauss talk 12:28, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 13:01, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 13:01, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • 20-Mule-Team Delete: Seriously? Completely unreferenced, never has been referenced, has had the same form, format and rankings for nine years (are all of those players even still alive?), no sources on Google except for this article and Wiki mirrors. Far from being "generally regarded as the top level of squash competition for senior citizens in Massachusetts" (whom by, exactly?), I'm wondering if this outfit even exists, something fueled by that the creation of this article was the sole Wikipedia activity of the editor who did so. Ravenswing 14:40, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete this is a classic example of what happens when no notability controls exist.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:06, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.