Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Markmeets
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 16:52, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Markmeets[edit]
- Markmeets (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not meet WP:WEB, I can’t find significant coverage in reliable sources for this website. January (talk) 09:54, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:49, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per nom, has not attracted the notice of reliable sources unrelated to the web content, its authors, or its owners and very little notice from independent sources. Theroadislong (talk) 09:12, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:10, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 11:27, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Only this shows a little change of notability, but you have to win an award, not just be nominated for one, to be notable. King Jakob C2 12:04, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.