Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marketing activation
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:54, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Marketing activation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Pure jargon. I have been unable to find any meaning distinct from "how to plan advertising " I am very reluctant to propose this as a reason for deletion, and I think this is the first time I have every done so, since I know my failure to understand may be my own lack of knowledge. I will of course withdrawthe afd if that proves to be the case. ~ 'DGG (at NYPL) (talk) 17:59, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 July 15. Snotbot t • c » 18:56, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I also don't know enough about the topic to really know if this is a distinct and notable topic. However enough sources are provided which use the expression so that the article shouldn't be deleted. Kitfoxxe (talk) 23:21, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:48, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:48, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - a quick review of the sources shows at least the appearance of notability. I see respected journals and textbooks in the footnotes, and assuming good faith, the offline sources seem to square. Bearian (talk) 19:13, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.