Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark S. Olsen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:45, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mark S. Olsen[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Biography of non-notable artist. Only citations are artist's own websites. Unable to locate any reliable sources such as reviews or newspaper articles. (Try [1] to avoid confounding names.) Stub has barely changed since 2007 and no sources have been added or appear forthcoming. Chiswick Chap (talk) 05:42, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:03, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:03, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:07, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I, too, was unable to find any independent reliable sources to establish notability--William Thweatt ^Talk | ^Contribs 01:26, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I took a look a few local (NZ) art galleries and found that he is considered to be a reasonably notable contemporary New Zealand artist. Whether this extends outside the country, I do not know, but suspect probably not. The article needs work, but not deletion.NealeFamily (talk) 10:08, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger _{One ping only} 01:37, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger _{One ping only} 02:45, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.