Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Pillow

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Superman IV: The Quest for Peace and deleting history per consensus. Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:44, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Pillow

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Minor actor with only one role of any significance. Fails WP:ENTERTAINER. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 17:33, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:01, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re-direct to Superman IV, as that's the only film he's in. Andrzejbanas (talk) 13:31, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete dispensable person; per his IMDB article, he acted in three films, including Superman IV, some TV-series called "Alaska Kid" and the TV-series "Wiseguy", a well-known TV-series back then, but he acted only in one episode. Delete in my opinion.--♫Greatorangepumpkin♫T 11:28, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete in his one and only role of any significance his voice was apparently dubbed in by someone else, so that doesn't exactly count for much. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 19:00, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Non-notable. Fails WP:ENTERTAINER and WP:GNG. —SW— ^gab 20:06, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect this stub to Superman IV: The Quest for Peace, as the one place where this actor has sourcable context[1] for his role as as "Nuclear Man"... just as the existing redirect for Nuclear Man already sends reader to that same article. His career and essentially one-event coverage does not merit a seperate article. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 00:37, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.