Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Cannons

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 05:51, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Cannons[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nothing notable about him. No coverage found. Fails WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 20:59, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:00, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:00, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:00, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No indication of notability. scope_creep^Talk 17:17, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not notable in the broader context; would probably only be deemed worthy of a very brief stub even on a cricket Fandom site. RobinCarmody (talk) 18:12, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. An article with no source with significant coverage. Fails in WP: GNG.✍A.WagnerC (talk) 21:01, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails NCRIC due to not having played at the highest domestic level – irrespective of the status afforded matches, those involving minor counties do not meet this standard. More importantly this also fails GNG, with no significant coverage found (only passing mentions in local routine cricket reports, and the usual wide-ranging databases) and no reason to expect that any exists. _wjemather^{please leave a message...} 16:05, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.