Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marcello Rosati

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. plicit 13:28, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Marcello Rosati[edit]

Marcello Rosati (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG. Paul Vaurie (talk) 09:45, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Paul Vaurie (talk) 09:45, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Paul Vaurie (talk) 09:45, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Paul Vaurie (talk) 09:45, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. Paul Vaurie (talk) 09:45, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Rosati fails WP:NFOOTY as the Vatican City isn't a FIFA member. He also fails GNG due to a lack of significant coverage about him. Dougal18 (talk) 10:44, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 14:33, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - fails GNG and NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 14:34, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, non-notable player. Nehme1499 14:55, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per above Dr Salvus 15:14, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep notable enough, and Vatican NT should in theory pass NFOOTY.--Ortizesp (talk) 14:39, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - the sources cited in the article are weak and do not show significant coverage; my searches don't show anything better either, even when filtering it so I just get Italian language results Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:46, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.